Search
Compliance
Saturday 4 September 2010 11:46 PM   Your IP: 38.107.191.95
Structural SEO
Home       SEO Enterprise Blog       Search Compliance       Structural SEO       The Semantic Imperative       About re1y.com       Contact Us      
Home
SEO Enterprise Blog
Enterprise SEO
Rank Preservation
When SEO Fails
Search Compliance
Google Penalty Solutions
The Ethics Of Search
Structural SEO
Multiple Sites
Defensive Strategies
Inbound Links
Link Vetting
Third Party Interference
Filename Masking
Black Hat Reality
Recourse & SEO
The Null Set Redundancy
The Semantic Imperative
In The Name Of Relevance?
Automation And SEO
PageRank
Content Authority
Google Penalties Insight
Link Authority Trainwreck
robots.txt
Paid Links
Securing robots.txt
Foreign Language Sites
nofollow
RDF / RDFa
Replacing Nofollow
Canonical Condom
Granularity In CMS
Evaluating SEO Agencies
Search Forensics: Subdomains & Supplemental Results
Google Hiding Link Metrics Behind Sample Links
Turn Old Product Pages Into Link Bait
3014

Enterprise SEO Blog

re1y roll
The Archive Link Magnet
Bob Sakayama
2010-08-12 20:39:05
Coping With The Loss of Link Metrics
Bob Sakayama
2010-07-25 03:10:26
usachatnow.com Penalized
dirtsgood
2010-07-22 15:19:42
Automating Compliance Via CMS
Rev Sale
2010-07-15 22:43:15
Caffeine May Have A Hidden Cost
Bob Sakayama
2010-07-08 11:35:34
Google Penalties And Nuked Domains
Bob Sakayama
2009-11-28 21:09:30
When Google Doesn't Like Your Business Model
dirtsgood
2009-11-09 12:41:20
Search Compliance For Subdomains
Jabaloni
2009-11-09 11:51:10
Google Penalty Solutions - An Example Unwind
Bob Sakayama
2009-11-04 21:21:01
Maintaining Search Compliance via CMS
OneInAmelia
2009-11-03 22:35:15
Still Reeling From The Affiliate Slap
dirtsgood
2009-11-02 22:47:01
Most Popular Penalties
Bob Sakayama
2009-11-01 22:06:52
Link Obfuscation Necessary On New Sites
Rev Sale
2009-11-01 21:46:56
Latest
By: Bob Sakayama
2010-07-25 03:10:26
Now that Google has withdrawn our ability to see the inbound links to our sites, alternative discovery techniques need to be investigated.

In case you have not been reading this site, Google used to show us all the links pointing to our sites. Just prior to 1 July 2010, they restricted the available metrics to only a small "sample" set of links. For some of our clients, this sample is less than 0.1% of their total links. A very deceptive link labeled "Download all external links" still sits at the bottom of the inbound links list, but this will only get you the sample list, not all external links.

Go take a look and see how your site is handled. Most large commerce sites will have pretty big numbers - 100,000 links is very common. If you have those kinds of numbers, then you're probably going to be disappointed to see the size of the 'sample' available to you in WMT.

We're working on alternatives, but really there are none that will tell us what Google is crediting our sites with. Many external tools, like seomoz, Yahoo linkdomain searches, etc. will show you a set of inbound links, so getting a list is not the problem. The issue is that if you're trying to run forensics on a rank problem in Google, you want to discover what Google is crediting you with, not all the links pointing at your site. This is especially important since Google never indexes or credits ALL the links, so being able to see the specific sources is what matters.

My question to Webmaster Central within Google forums has not been answered: Is the removal of inbound link metrics from WMT a permanent degradation of that tool? This leads me to suspect it's gone for good and that so few people care that there will be no pushback.

More on coping later.

Blog_id: 19 | Posted: 2010-07-25 03:10:26 | Views (51) | Comments (2)  
Comment By: dirtsgood
re: Coping With The Loss of Link Metrics
(posted 2010-08-11 11:11:41)

I interpret no answer from Google to mean that this is not going to revert to the previous state. These metrics are lost to us if no one else pushes back, and it looks like no one else is going to. Did you contact the other top seos to see if they would discuss this disaster in their forums?

Response By Bob Sakayama
in response to thread started by
dirtsgood
(posted 2010-08-11 11:43:55)

Contacted all the big names, including Bruce Clay, Danny Sullivan, Aaron Wall, etc. Only Danny Sullivan replied (via a proxy) and suggested (erroneously) that they may have already covered the topic in their blog. Have not seen a single post outside of re1y.com. I guess the big retail seos don't handle problems.

Latest
Home       SEO Enterprise Blog       Search Compliance       Structural SEO       The Semantic Imperative       About re1y.com       Contact Us      

re1y.com
Enterprise SEO
Google Penalty Solutions
Automation & Search Compliance

Looking for SEO enabled content management systems with structural, semantic optimization built into the cms? You're on the right site. Research identified targets are implemented within the markup, content, and filenames to enable the site to rank as high as possible based upon semantic relevance.