Search
Compliance
Wednesday 18 July 2018 02:02 AM   Your IP: 54.224.2.123
Structural SEO
Home       SEO Enterprise Blog       Search Compliance       Structural SEO       The Semantic Imperative       About re1y.com       Contact Us      

Enterprise SEO Blog

re1y roll
Gaming Google In The Gaming Industry
Bob Sakayama
2013-03-23 18:27:43
2012 SEO Disasters | Solutions
Bob Sakayama
2012-12-16 14:03:29
Google May Be Quietly Acknowledging Negative SEO
Bob Sakayama
2012-08-30 15:29:12
Unnatural Links Warning
Bob Sakayama
2012-07-25 17:05:11
Penguin Inadvertently Makes Paid Links More Valuable
Bob Sakayama
2012-04-29 14:01:46
Occupy Google
Bob Sakayama
2011-11-04 12:57:49
Google Has Lost The War Against Paid Links
Bob Sakayama
2011-05-07 16:33:19
Google Penalties Now Called Manual Actions
Bob Sakayama
2011-04-23 16:27:14
Google Bomb Today
Ryan Urban
2011-04-11 17:05:11
Penalized Site Seeks Help: papofurado.com
Valmir Fernandes
2011-03-17 17:56:06
Did The Hammer Come Down On Content Aggregators
Bob Sakayama
2011-03-02 22:22:24
Enterprise Search Manipulation
Bob Sakayama
2011-02-19 19:12:08
Google Has A Huge Cloaking Problem
Bob Sakayama
2011-01-21 20:33:20
A Sorry Tale of a Google Penalty in Action
Dr. Marc Pinter-Krainer
2010-12-13 11:46:50
A New Google Penalty
Bob Sakayama
2010-11-28 21:49:40
The Archive Link Magnet
Bob Sakayama
2010-08-12 20:39:05
Coping With The Loss of Link Metrics
Bob Sakayama
2010-07-25 03:10:26
usachatnow.com Penalized
dirtsgood
2010-07-22 15:19:42
Automating Compliance Via CMS
Rev Sale
2010-07-15 22:43:15
Caffeine May Have A Hidden Cost
Bob Sakayama
2010-07-08 11:35:34
Google Penalties And Nuked Domains
Bob Sakayama
2009-11-28 21:09:30
When Google Doesn't Like Your Business Model
dirtsgood
2009-11-09 12:41:20
Search Compliance For Subdomains
Jabaloni
2009-11-09 11:51:10
Google Penalty Solutions - An Example Unwind
Bob Sakayama
2009-11-04 21:21:01
Maintaining Search Compliance via CMS
OneInAmelia
2009-11-03 22:35:15
Still Reeling From The Affiliate Slap
dirtsgood
2009-11-02 22:47:01
Most Popular Penalties
Bob Sakayama
2009-11-01 22:06:52
Link Obfuscation Necessary On New Sites
Rev Sale
2009-11-01 21:46:56
Latest
By: Rev Sale
2009-11-01 21:46:56
We're wondering, now that it's going on 3 years, whether Google's getting better at identifying paid links. Seeing plenty of sites penalized for buying.

Even seeing Google speciously flagging links when asked. We have several clients who spend so much money in AdWords that they have close connections via customer service. Unfair right? While most of the world can't get answers, there are some who get the royal treatment. But sometimes that royal treatment is diversion. But I digress.

The problem we found is this: Take a new site and throw paid links at it. Very likely to get it penalized.

Then take a new site and first first throw garbage links at it - links from bookmarks, comments, software PAD files, etc. Once they're visible in Google, push out the paid links.

Voila! Huge drop in penalty vulnerability.

When it comes to obfuscation, the more the merrier.

RS

Blog_id: 1 | Posted: 2009-11-01 21:46:56 | Views (7,620) | Comments (4)  
Comment By: DonkeyDust
re: Link Obfuscation Necessary On New Sites
(posted 2009-11-01 22:01:40)

Rev, can you please post more specifics. I know this is significant, but can't see it from your post. So you throw PR0 links first, then paids, and you get away with the paids. Is that right?

Response By Rev Sale
in response to thread started by
DonkeyDust
(posted 2009-11-01 22:04:03)

Yup. You got it. Posting about 200-300 links to get 50 to stick.

Response By Gwen
in response to thread started by
DonkeyDust
(posted 2009-11-11 20:12:15)

So why does this work? Seems crazy, and if it weren't for you guys saying it, I wouldn't believe it. Can u elucidate, please?

Response By Rev Sale
in response to thread started by
DonkeyDust
(posted 2009-11-12 22:42:23)

Gwen - the way to think about this is that you want to make evaluation difficult. If you just throw paid links at a page that has no others - that makes it easy to out you. But what if there were several hundred links there and 20 paids among them? Granted there is still risk - anything involving paid links will carry risk. But if you find a way to make that risk manageable, this can be a valuable strategy that works in the real world. And there's always a disclaimer: If you deploy any new strategy that games the system, be ready for surprises.

AND NEVER POINT HOME.

Latest
Home       SEO Enterprise Blog       Search Compliance       Structural SEO       The Semantic Imperative       About re1y.com       Contact Us      

re1y.com
Enterprise SEO
Google Penalty Solutions
Automation & Search Compliance

Looking for SEO enabled content management systems with structural, semantic optimization built into the cms? You're on the right site. Research identified targets are implemented within the markup, content, and filenames to enable the site to rank as high as possible based upon semantic relevance. 34789366G off site content requirements