Search
Compliance
Wednesday 14 November 2018 05:28 PM   Your IP: 54.163.20.57
Structural SEO
Home       SEO Enterprise Blog       Search Compliance       Structural SEO       The Semantic Imperative       About re1y.com       Contact Us      

Enterprise SEO Blog

re1y roll
Gaming Google In The Gaming Industry
Bob Sakayama
2013-03-23 18:27:43
2012 SEO Disasters | Solutions
Bob Sakayama
2012-12-16 14:03:29
Google May Be Quietly Acknowledging Negative SEO
Bob Sakayama
2012-08-30 15:29:12
Unnatural Links Warning
Bob Sakayama
2012-07-25 17:05:11
Penguin Inadvertently Makes Paid Links More Valuable
Bob Sakayama
2012-04-29 14:01:46
Occupy Google
Bob Sakayama
2011-11-04 12:57:49
Google Has Lost The War Against Paid Links
Bob Sakayama
2011-05-07 16:33:19
Google Penalties Now Called Manual Actions
Bob Sakayama
2011-04-23 16:27:14
Google Bomb Today
Ryan Urban
2011-04-11 17:05:11
Penalized Site Seeks Help: papofurado.com
Valmir Fernandes
2011-03-17 17:56:06
Did The Hammer Come Down On Content Aggregators
Bob Sakayama
2011-03-02 22:22:24
Enterprise Search Manipulation
Bob Sakayama
2011-02-19 19:12:08
Google Has A Huge Cloaking Problem
Bob Sakayama
2011-01-21 20:33:20
A Sorry Tale of a Google Penalty in Action
Dr. Marc Pinter-Krainer
2010-12-13 11:46:50
A New Google Penalty
Bob Sakayama
2010-11-28 21:49:40
The Archive Link Magnet
Bob Sakayama
2010-08-12 20:39:05
Coping With The Loss of Link Metrics
Bob Sakayama
2010-07-25 03:10:26
usachatnow.com Penalized
dirtsgood
2010-07-22 15:19:42
Automating Compliance Via CMS
Rev Sale
2010-07-15 22:43:15
Caffeine May Have A Hidden Cost
Bob Sakayama
2010-07-08 11:35:34
Google Penalties And Nuked Domains
Bob Sakayama
2009-11-28 21:09:30
When Google Doesn't Like Your Business Model
dirtsgood
2009-11-09 12:41:20
Search Compliance For Subdomains
Jabaloni
2009-11-09 11:51:10
Google Penalty Solutions - An Example Unwind
Bob Sakayama
2009-11-04 21:21:01
Maintaining Search Compliance via CMS
OneInAmelia
2009-11-03 22:35:15
Still Reeling From The Affiliate Slap
dirtsgood
2009-11-02 22:47:01
Most Popular Penalties
Bob Sakayama
2009-11-01 22:06:52
Link Obfuscation Necessary On New Sites
Rev Sale
2009-11-01 21:46:56
Latest
By: Bob Sakayama
2009-11-01 22:06:52
For the past 6 months, the clear winner is the trademark suppression, full blown. Second was the trademark suppression on trademark + service/product only.

Full blown trademark suppression is the loss of the #1 position for the search of your web trademark (domain minus the extension).

When the site is not #1 for "web_trademark + product/service" eg "re1y seo" you're looking at a slightly less severe penalty.

(editors note: if your domain name is a semantic search already, the above tests may not show #1. For example if your site were best-widgets.com)

These 2 penalties overwhelm the link triggered penalties by over 2-1. This is in contrast to late 2007, when the link penalties were in vogue.

Most of the time, the domain level issues that trigger these 2 penalties are ignorance driven, not automation driven, so discovery and remediation is usually very straightforward.

We also now assume a structural problem first, ignoring link issues. The reason for this is that if we link vet first, it's costly, but also, removing links likely means that the site is coming back weaker.

Focusing on the structure allows us to file the first reconsideration based on non link considerations. If we can get back from structural issues, ranks are preserved.

Of course if the links are the real problem, then you're going downhill anyway. But by focusing first on structure, we are using the odds here. Most likely to be structure.

This could change, but for now this strategy is saving clients money.

Blog_id: 2 | Posted: 2009-11-01 22:06:52 | Views (7,376) | Comments (5)  
Comment By: 8cat4lunch
re: Most Popular Penalties
(posted 2009-11-01 22:36:39)

Can you please walk us through one of the unwinds you've done on a trademark suppression? Is that possible?

I know I'm not the only one who would like this. Thank you.

Response By Jonathan Meyer
in response to thread started by
8cat4lunch
(posted 2009-11-01 22:39:39)

Second that.

Response By William
in response to thread started by
8cat4lunch
(posted 2009-11-01 22:42:05)

Agree - obviously can't share confidential info - and no client is going to want to appear in this blog. But would love to see what gets done to clear the penalty.

Response By Bob Sakayama
in response to thread started by
8cat4lunch
(posted 2009-11-04 20:58:39)

Will do. Got to pick a simple example and it will be my next post.

Response By booter
in response to thread started by
8cat4lunch
(posted 2009-11-04 21:16:26)

Also would like to see this. And can you show us some examples of experiments where you intentionally get a site penalized for forensic purposes?

Latest
Home       SEO Enterprise Blog       Search Compliance       Structural SEO       The Semantic Imperative       About re1y.com       Contact Us      

re1y.com
Enterprise SEO
Google Penalty Solutions
Automation & Search Compliance

Looking for SEO enabled content management systems with structural, semantic optimization built into the cms? You're on the right site. Research identified targets are implemented within the markup, content, and filenames to enable the site to rank as high as possible based upon semantic relevance. 34789366G off site content requirements